Thursday, October 10, 2013

Knowledgeable unskilled Engineers...

As mentioned in one of my earlier posts, mechanical engineers are rarely taught ( in Indian engineering colleges ) during their graduate or undergraduate programs on certain skills they need the most. My quick list is as follows:

  • Hand calculation - Eg: To calculate the power required to drive a machine
  • Reading engineering drawings  and understand the various notations (like GD&T)
  • Knowledge of materials and their selection
  • Knowledge of manufacturing processes and their limitations (practical aspects)
  • Selecting various elements like motor, gearbox, servo, sensors, actuators etc.
  • Understanding how parts are assembled and their implications
  • How to make engineering judgement from measurements and results. 
Even though mechanical engineers are taught on doing calculations like finding the force, torque etc. it is not taught in a practical application point of view where in they get to apply their knowledge of calculating forces on a given engineering problem. If a fresh mechanical engineer is asked to find the motor power required to drive a conveyor carrying a load of 100 kg at 15 m/min, I have serious doubts how many could actually attempt doing this. However if you ask them to find the power for a given torque and speed they will do this in minutes. The problem actually lies in the habit of finding results based on "given" data. Engineers are not trained in assuming, building hypothesis, approximation etc. In fact this is the skill that differentiates an engineer from a technician. 

I am reminded of a good old story where an expert was called to fix a leaking boiler. He inspected the boiler, found the cause  and location of leak and asked his technician to do the repair to arrest the leak. Finally he charged  $100. The company official who was supposed make the payment asked : "You mean $100 for just arresting a leak?" The expert replied: " Arresting the leak costs only $ 2, while finding the cause of leak costs $ 98 ! " 

The grim reality of our engineering education is that none of our engineers (includes me when I too passed out as a fresh engineer) get a mental picture of what they are supposed to do in an industrial setting. Very few actually have to derive differential equations and do matrix multiplication as part of their day to day job, unless they are into core design and engineering research. However they should be able to manage resources, find the right vendors, select and order engineering goods like motor, gearbox etc., do some quick calculations, choose a suitable manufacturing process and so on. All these skills are for mechanical engineers who manage production and projects. 

The very engineering faculty who are supposed to teach this do not get a chance or rather do not get trained in doing such calculations during their career. The same reason applies to all the important skills I have listed.

The last point, engineering judgement is probably the most important skill, not only for mechanical engineers, but for any engineer. For a mechanical engineer this skill is required for him to be able to anticipate whether a given system can or might fail and under what circumstances. This skill differentiates a skilled engineer from a knowledgeable engineer. 

To summarize, I would say that fresh engineers are knowledgeable, but not skilled enough. They know how to do calculations for some given quantities. They learn some facts, pass exams, earn a degree. For example, they know what drilling is. But may not know how to choose a pilot drill. They also might not know that drilling process usually produces a larger hole than the one it is intended for. Eg. A 10 mm drill produces a 10.1 mm or 10.2 mm  hole. They might have learned about induction motor, how to start a motor in lab, etc. but might not know how to choose a motor for a given application. These highlight one important drawback in our education system, we create knowledgeable engineers who are not skilled enough! Of course these skills can only be attained through experience. About a decade ago we had the luxury to wait to get an engineer trained on the job till he/she acquires the skill. In these days when the world goes so fast and is well connected industry needs everything faster and earlier which means engineers need to be imparted some of these skills during their undergraduate program itself. 

Any possible solution?

Train the engineering faculty to further train the students so that they become reasonably skilled enough for a job. Teachers to be trained not on theory but on practical engineering skills. I shall put in my thoughts on how this training can be implemented in practice.

Wednesday, October 09, 2013

Concept of Force

If we are trying to pedal a bicycle gently, we require a particular amount of effort which all of us intuitively know. However if we need to move it at a higher speed, we need to “push” it hard. Now, if we have pillion rider on the bicycle we need to put in more effort. Thus we find that the “push” is related (read proportional) to the mass as well as the increase in speed ( change is speed per unit time or acceleration ). Now the question is why we multiply mass and acceleration. Whenever we need to bring in the effect of two or more quantities simultaneously, we multiply them. We need to bring the effect of both mass and acceleration simultaneously. We also multiply things when they are related. If one (mass or acceleration) is more the other has to be proportionately less for the same force. Hence we multiply mass and acceleration to quantify our “push” and we call this quantity as a Force.

We define force,F = m * a, where m is the mass of the body and a the linear acceleration of the body on a plane.

Please be forewarned that forces exist even if there is no motion associated with it. A bridge is permanently applying a force by way of it's weight on the columns. However there is no visible motion. There will be a separate post on stationary forces.

Sunday, September 22, 2013

The secret behind the value of "e" (Euler's number) which is 2.718...

For a long time since my pre-degree  (the current +2) days I was puzzled by the peculiar value of 2.718.. for "e". It is after about 10 years of my graduation, that the puzzle got cleared.  I thought I should uncover the "secret" and let others get benefited out of it.

I will start with the basics. Let us plot two graphs, one for y = 2x and the other for y = 3x . We will see shortly why we do this. We arbitrarily take some x values say from 1 to 10 and plot the graphs.

Next we simply take the ratio of the slope at any point on the graph to the corresponding ordinate. I would request you to refresh your memory on what is an ordinate and abscissa. Ordinate is the y value for a corresponding x value (abscissa). For the y = 2x graph we have a value of 1024 as ordinate for an abscissa of 10. 
Similarly for y = 3x we have a value of 59049 as the ordinate for an abscissa of 10.

Now if we calculate the slope at this point on y = 2x       
 we get a value of 709.7 and on
y = 3x
 we get a value of 64872.

 If we take the ratio of the slope to the corresponding ordinate for each graph we get values of 0.69 (709.7/1024) and 1.09 (64872/59049) respectively for 2 and 3 .

As we watch very closely we arrive at an important finding here. There should be some point between 2 and 3 which when raised to x should give a value of 1 (which is between 0.69 and 1.09). This golden number is the value "e", ie. 2.718.. If we plot the graph for  2.718x we find that the slope/ordinate ratio is equal to one. Slope is nothing but the differential of any point on the graph. Thus slope/ordinate is the same as writing (dy/dx) / y. In our case 
 y = ex. Also please recollect that the slope (differential) of ex is equal to ex
Hence the ratio of differential of ex to ex is always 1 !

Saturday, September 21, 2013

A must watch for young and "would be" teachers


Probably one of the great teachers of this century. If only we had one such teacher in every college or school....

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

I'm back

After a long gap I'm back with my blogging. For the last few months I wanted to write about many things related to design and teaching and it looks like the time has come. My interests have grown over this long gap from just engineering design to industrial design, sketching and programming. Of these, sketching has caught me like anything and I invariably make at least one sketch every day. Following are two of my sketches. The first one is just a phone. The one on the right is actually a concept drawing board that saves space in drawing halls of engineering colleges. The proposed design is of a foldable drawing board that comes with a seat ! Will be back with more posts. Till then bye.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

CAD modeling to Clay Modeling !! 

Any guess on where the big boys of CAD are heading for? I think it's definitely for the good. The direction in which they go seems to be really promising. There should be really good product managers out there who are driving innovative technologies in their labs.

Have a look at what Autodesk have in their kitty:

The multi touch interface seems to have a good fortune since it's going to improve productivity tremendously. Working with CAD tools become more like clay modeling !  This would even attract artists and other creative designers to use these tools and interactive design becomes quite ubiquitous. Imagine having a multi - touch wall where more than one person could work on a design.

One can couple this with augmented reality and you really get the power of computing at your finger tips.

I am trying to postulate what interesting applications or even business models could emerge from such technologies. I am eager to lay my hands on such innovative devices that makes design easier, faster and exciting.

Monday, October 19, 2009

 ESO - the next big thing?

ESO - Engineering Services Outsourcing, NASSCOM says, is the next big thing after BPO. A recent study by NASSCOM points to a $40 bn opportunity for India by 2020. Can India achieve this potential given the dearth of  talented engineers in this domain?

ESO requires domain expertise along with knowledge of CAD tools. There are a lot of engineers out there who are trained in CAD tools. But domain expertise comes only from hands on experience in the engineering industry. Recently I was reading one of the posts by Mr.Deelip Menezes (CEO and founder of Sycode) in his blog( which says that only 5% of CAD users in US have an engineering degree. What would be the number like in India?

Of the lakhs of engineers churned out of engineering colleges, how many really choose design as their career? Yet to see a study on this. Also, it is not clear whether the $40bn market includes areas like industrial/packaging design?

Will the new strategies adopted by CAD software vendors (eg.Alibre design giving CAD software for $99 ! , solidworks giving a three month trial license, PTC giving a limited version of their software for free... ) attract more engineers towards this career?

Let's wishfully hope that India can garner the great opportunity lying ahead.